Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

If a forfeiture statute clearly states that all right, title and interest in property' obtained by criminals via the illicit means described in the statute 'vests in the United States upon the commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture.' 21 U.S.C. § 853(c) (1982 ed., Supp. V) this is known as the taint theory of forfeiture. This approach, known as the 'taint theory,' is one that 'has long been recognized in forfeiture cases,' including the decision in United States v. Stowell, 133 U.S. 1 (1890). See S. Rep. No. 98-225, p. 200, and n. 27 (1983).

In Stowell, the Court explained the operation of a forfeiture provision (for violations of the Internal Revenue Code) as follows: 'As soon as [the possessor of the forfeitable asset committed the violation] of the internal revenue laws, the forfeiture under those laws took effect, and (though needing judicial condemnation to perfect it) operated from that time as a statutory conveyance to the United States of all the right, title and interest then remaining in the [possessor]; and was as valid and effectual, against all the world, as a recorded deed. The right so vested in the United States ...

Register or login to access full content