Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

With some statutes, punctuation has been relied upon to indicate that a phrase set off by commas is independent of the language that followed. See United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 241, 103 L. Ed. 2d 290, 109 S. Ct. 1026 (1989) (interpreting the Bankruptcy Code).

However, punctuation is not necessarily decisive in construing statutes, see Costanzo v. Tillinghast, 287 U.S. 341, 344, 77 L. Ed. 350, 53 S. Ct. 152 (1932), and with many statutes, a mental state adverb adjacent to initial words has been applied to phrases or clauses appearing later in the statute without regard to the punctuation or structure of the statute. See Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 426-29, 85 L. Ed. 2d 434, 105 S. Ct. 2084 (1985) (interpreting food stamps provision); United States v. Nofziger, 278 U.S. App. D.C. 340, 878 F.2d 442, 446-50 (D.C. Cir.) (interpreting government 'revolving door' statute), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003, 107 L. Ed. 2d 559, 110 S. Ct. 564 (1989); United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 667-69 (3d Cir. 1984) (interpreting the conservation act), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208, 105 ...

Register or login to access full content