Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

In the ordinary case, courts simply apply the unambiguous terms of a statute to the case before them. See Chevron, U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842, 81 L. Ed. 2d 694, 104 S. Ct. 2778 (1984) ('If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.').

If the language of the statute is not clear on its face, courts examine the specific and general statutory context in which the phrase is used in an effort to discern a determinate meaning. See Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 341, 136 L. Ed. 2d 808, 117 S. Ct. 843 (1997) ('The plainness or ambiguity of statutory language is determined by reference to the language itself, the specific context in which that language is used, and the broader context of the statute as a whole'); Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co., 505 U.S. 469, 477, 120 L. Ed. 2d 379, 112 S. Ct. 2589 (1992); McCarthy v. Bronson, 500 U.S. 136, 139, 114 L. Ed. 2d 194, ...

Register or login to access full content