Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 In Marshall v. Kansas City Southern Railways Company, 7 So.3d 210, 213-214 (Miss.2009), the Court addressed whether a voluntary dismissal of a complaint had any effect on the tolling of the statute of limitations. The court found that it did not toll the limitations period. Id. at 213-14. In Marshall, the Court stated: This Court previously has held that a voluntary dismissal without prejudice: [D]oes not deprive the defendant of any defense he may be entitled to make to the new suit, nor confer any new right or advantage on the complainant (plaintiff), and hence it will not have the effect of excepting from the period prescribed by the statute of limitations, the time during which that suit was pending. Smith v. Copiah County, 232 Miss. 838, 100 So.2d 614, 616 (1958) (quoting W.T. Raleigh Co. v. Barnes, 143 Miss. 597, 109 So. 8, 9 (1926) (quoting Nevitt v. Bacon, 32 Miss. 212, 228 (1856) (emphasis added))). Id. In other words, when a party chooses voluntarily to dismiss an action, the party receives no tolling benefit. 

'Ordinarily, when a complaint is filed and properly served, that complaint tolls the running of the ...

Register or login to access full content