Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

A number of courts have found that names typed at the end of emails can be signatures under various states' statutes of frauds and enactments of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ('UETA'). E.g., Preston Law Firm, L.L.C. v. Mariner Health Care Mgmt. Co., 622 F.3d 384, 391 (5th Cir. 2010) (affirming that '[e]mails can qualify as the signed writings needed to form contracts' under Louisiana's UETA); Lamle v. Mattel, Inc., 394 F.3d 1355, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (opining that inclusion of individual's name on email would be valid signature under California's UETA); Cloud Corp. v. Hasbro, Inc., 314 F.3d 289, 295-96 (7th Cir. 2002) (holding that 'the sender's name on an e-mail satisfies the signature requirement of the [Illinois] statute of frauds' and noting that it would be valid signature under federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act as well); Adani Exps. Ltd. v. AMCI Exp. Corp., Civ. A. No. 05-304, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88969, 2007 WL 4298525, at *11 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2007) (finding email sufficient to meet requirements of Pennsylvania statute of frauds); Roger Edwards, LLC. v. Fiddes & Son, Ltd., 245 F. Supp. 2d 251, 261 (D. ...

Register or login to access full content