Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Whether the acts of part performance are unequivocally referable to the vendor-vendee relationship under the oral contract is in this case a question of fact for the trier of fact. See, Seitz v. Sitze, 215 Minn. 452, 10 N.W. (2d) 426; Ritchie v. Jennings, 181 Minn. 458, 233 N.W. 20; Place v. Johnson, 20 Minn. 198 (219). 

 See Burns v. McCormick, 233 N.Y. 230, 135 N.E. 273, 273 (1922) ('Not every act of part performance will move a court of equity, though legal remedies are inadequate, to enforce an oral agreement affecting rights in land. There must be performance `unequivocally referable' to the agreement, performance which alone and without the aid of words of promise is unintelligible or at least extraordinary unless as an incident of ownership, assured, if not existing.'); Woolley v. Stewart, 222 N.Y. 347, 118 N.E. 847, 848 (1918) ('An act which admits of explanation without reference to the alleged oral contract or a contract of the same general nature and purpose is not, in general, admitted to constitute a part performance.'), quoted with approval in Alvarez, 72 N.M. at 342, 383 P.2d at 585. 

A court ...

Register or login to access full content