Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Holdings have made clear that the relevant question is not simply whether a private group is serving a 'public function' but whether the function performed has been 'traditionally the exclusive prerogative of the State.' Jackson, 419 U. S. 353; quoted in Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U. S. 1011 (emphasis added).  

Under the Court’s cases, a private entity may qualify as a state actor when it exercises “powers traditionally exclusively reserved to the State.” Jackson, 419 U. S., at 352, 95 S. Ct. 449, 42 L. Ed. 2d 477. It is not enough that the federal, state, or local government exercised the function in the past, or still does. And it is not enough that the function serves the public good or  the public interest in some way. Rather, to qualify as a traditional, exclusive public function within the meaning of our state-action precedents, the government must have traditionally and exclusively performed the function. See Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U. S. 830, 842, 102 S. Ct. 2764, 73 L. Ed. 2d 418 (1982); Jackson, 419 U. S., at 352-353, 95 S. Ct. 449, 42 L. Ed. 2d 477; Evans v. Newton, 382 U. ...

Register or login to access full content