Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

See Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946). A conspirator is liable for all offenses committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, even those of coconspirators.

In Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 90 L. Ed. 1489, 66 S. Ct. 1180 (1946) the Supreme Court held that a party to a continuing conspiracy may be responsible 'when the substantive offense is committed by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the [conspiracy],' even though he does not participate in the substantive offense or have any knowledge of it. Id. at 647. 

The liability of an accused for acts committed by co-conspirators is often called 'Pinkerton' liability, after the case in which the United States Supreme Court recognized the doctrine as part of federal criminal law and upheld it against a double jeopardy challenge. Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489 (1946). The Court held that a conspirator may be found responsible for crimes committed by a co-conspirator, as long as the acts making up the crimes are reasonably foreseeable and are carried out in furtherance of the conspiracy, even though the conspirator did not participate ...

Register or login to access full content