Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The Court has developed a relatively straightforward test for determining what expectations of privacy are protected by the Fourth Amendment with respect to the possession of personal property. If personal property is in the plain view of the public, the possession of the property is in no sense 'private,' and hence is unprotected: 'What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection.' 389 U. S. 351 (1967). See Smith v. Maryland, 442 U. S. 735, 442 U. S. 744-746 (1979); United States v. Miller, 425 U. S. 435, 425 U. S. 442 (1976); United States v. Dionisio, 410 U. S. 1, 410 U. S. 14 (1973). When a person's property is concealed from public view, however, then the fact of his possession is private, and the subject of Fourth Amendment protection.

'One point on which the Court was in virtually unanimous agreement in Robbins v. California, 453 U. S. 420 (1981) was that a constitutional distinction between 'worthy' and 'unworthy' containers would be improper. . . . [T]he central purpose of the Fourth Amendment forecloses such a distinction. For just as the ...

Register or login to access full content