Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

See also Exclusionary rule. In the Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383 (1914) case, the Court 'for the first time' held that, 'in a federal prosecution, the Fourth Amendment barred the use of evidence secured through an illegal search and seizure.' The Court has ever since required of federal law officers a strict adherence to that command which the Court has held to be a clear, specific, and constitutionally required -- even if judicially implied -- deterrent safeguard without insistence upon which the Fourth Amendment would have been reduced to 'a form of words.' Holmes, J., Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U. S. 385, 251 U. S. 392 (1920). It meant, quite simply, that 'conviction by means of unlawful seizures and enforced confessions . . . should find no sanction in the judgments of the courts . . . ,' Weeks v. United States, supra, at 232 U. S. 392, and that such evidence 'shall not be used at all.' Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, supra, at 251 U. S. 392. 

In Byars v. United States, 273 U. S. 28 (1927), a unanimous Court declared that 'the ...

Register or login to access full content