Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Instrumentalities historically have been treated as a form of 'guilty property' that can be forfeited in civil in rem proceedings. See Austin v. United States, 509 U. S., at 627-628 (SCALIA, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment), Instrumentality fairly characterizes property that historically was subject to forfeiture because it was the actual means by which an offense was committed. See e. g., J. W Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United States, 254 U. S. 505,508-510 (1921). 'Instrumentality' forfeitures have historically been limited to the property actually used to commit an offense and no more. See Austin v. United States, supra, at 627-628 (SCALIA, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). A forfeiture that reaches beyond this strict historical limitation is ipso facto punitive and therefore subject to review under the Excessive Fines Clause. 

Register or login to access full content