Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

See Pornography. See Obscenity. 

Obscene material is not speech entitled to First Amendment protection. Miller v. California, ante p. 413 U. S. 15; Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476. P. 413 U. S. 54. 

Obscene speech, has long been held to fall outside the purview of the First Amendment. See, e.g., Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 484-485 (1957). But the Supreme Court struggled in the past to define obscenity in a manner that did not impose an impermissible burden on protected speech. See Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Dallas, 390 U. S. 676, 704 (1968) (Harlan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (referring to the 'intractable obscenity problem'); see also Miller v. California, 413 U. S., at 20-23 (reviewing 'the somewhat tortured history of th[is] Court's obscenity decisions'). The difficulty resulted from the belief that 'in the area of freedom of speech and press the courts must always remain sensitive to any infringement on genuinely serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific expression.' Id., at 22-23. Ending over a decade of turmoil, the Court in Miller set forth the governing three-part test for assessing ...

Register or login to access full content