Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Disclosure of contributions minimizes the potential for abuse of the campaign finance system. Disclosure requirements are in part “justified based on a governmental interest in ‘providing the electorate with information’ about the sources of election-related spending.” Citizens United, 558 U.S., at 367, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753 (quoting Buckley, supra, at 66, 96 S. Ct. 612, 46 L. Ed. 2d 659). They may also “deter actual corruption and avoid the appearance of corruption by exposing large contributions and expenditures to the light of publicity.” Id., at 67, 96 S. Ct. 612, 46 L. Ed. 2d 659. Disclosure requirements burden speech, but-unlike the aggregate limits-they do not impose a ceiling on speech. Citizens United, supra, at 366, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753; but see McConnell, supra, at 275-277, 124 S. Ct. 619, 157 L. Ed. 2d 491 (opinion of Thomas, J.). For that reason, disclosure often represents a less restrictive alternative to flat bans on certain types or quantities of speech. See, e.g., Federal Election Comm’n v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc., 479 U.S. 238, 262, 107 S. Ct. 616, 93 L. Ed. 2d 539 (1986).

With ...

Register or login to access full content