Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

A child's companionship and affection to a parent. See also Parental consortium and also Loss of consortium. A review of the case law reveals little support for the adoption of a cause of action for the loss of filial consortium. At common law, the father of a tortiously injured child did have a cause of action to recover the value of the child's loss of services and the medical expenses incurred on the child's behalf. See Jones, 170 Eng. Rep. 334; W. Page Keaton et al., Prosser and Keaton on the Law of Torts § 125, at 934 (5th ed. 1984) [hereinafter Prosser]; see also Skollingsberg v. Brookover, 26 Utah 2d 45, 484 P.2d 1177, 1178 (Utah 1971); Ostertag v. LaMont, 339 P.2d 1022, 1026 (Utah 1959); Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, 124 N.H. 719, 475 A.2d 19, 21 (N.H. 1984). However, this action was based on a father's right to his minor children's services and a father's obligation to pay his minor children's medical expenses. See Jones v. Brown, 170 Eng. Rep. 334 (1794); Prosser at 934; see also Skollingsberg, 484 P.2d at 1178-79; Ostertag, 339 P.2d at 1026; Siciliano, 475 A.2d at 21. ...

Register or login to access full content