Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Rule 901 'does not definitively establish the nature or quantum of proof that is required' preliminarily to authenticate an item of evidence. Id. at 499. 'The type and quantum of evidence' required is 'related to the purpose for which the evidence is offered,' id. at 488, and depends upon a context-specific determination whether the proof advanced is sufficient to support a finding that the item in question is what its proponent claims it to be. We have said that '[t]he bar for authentication of evidence is not particularly high.' United States v. Gagliardi, 506 F.3d 140, 151 (2d Cir. 2007). But even though '[t]he proponent need not rule out all possibilities inconsistent with authenticity, or . . . prove beyond any doubt that the evidence is what it purports to be,' id. (internal quotation marks omitted), there must nonetheless be at least 'sufficient proof . . . so that a reasonable juror could find in favor of authenticity or identification,' Pluta, 176 F.3d at 49 (internal quotation marks omitted).

The 'proof of authentication may be direct or circumstantial.' United States v. Al-Moayad, 545 F.3d 139, 172 (2d Cir. 2008). The simplest (and likely most ...

Register or login to access full content