Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 Authentication is an aspect of relevancy. Advisory Committee Note, FED. R. EVID. 901(a) (citations omitted); 31 WRIGHT & GOLD, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE § 7102 at 13 (2000). 'The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.' FED. R. EVID. 901(a). See 5 SALTZBURG, MARTIN & CAPRA, FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE MANUAL § 901.02[1] at 901-5 (8th ed. 2002). The threshold for the Court's determination of authenticity is not high. See, e.g., United States v. Reilly, 33 F.3d 1396, 1404 (3d Cir. 1994) ('the burden of proof for authentication is slight'); United States v. Holmquist, 36 F.3d 154, 168 (1st Cir. 1994) ('the standard for authentication, and hence for admissibility, is one of reasonable likelihood'); United States v. Coohey, 11 F.3d 97, 99 (8th Cir. 1993) ('the proponent need only demonstrate a rational basis for its claim that the evidence is what the proponent asserts it to be'). The question for the Court under Rule 901 is whether the proponent of the evidence has 'offered a foundation from which the jury ...

Register or login to access full content