Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 Federal Rule of Evidence 801 states: 'A statement is not hearsay if . . . the statement is offered against a party and is (A) the party's own statement, in either an individual or a representative capacity . . . .' Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(A). Such a statement does not have to be inculpatory. 

The courts that have addressed the issue have held that, in accordance with the language of Rule 801 (d)(2), the statement need only be made by the party against whom it is offered. See United States v. Turner, 995 F.2d 1357, 1363 (6th Cir.) ('On its face, Rule 801(d)(2) does not limit an admission to a statement against interest. Furthermore, this court has refused to place such a limited construction on the scope of an admission.'), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 904, 126 L. Ed. 2d 232, 114 S. Ct. 282 (1993); Marquis Theatre Corp. v. Condado Mini Cinema, 846 F.2d 86, 90 n.3 (1st Cir. 1988) (interpreting Rule 801(d)(2) on its face and rejecting the contention that admissions under Rule 801(d)(2) must be against interest either at the time the statement is made or at the time of trial); ...

Register or login to access full content