Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

At common law, there was substantial authority that the silence of an individual or group of individuals is hearsay, as an implied assertion. See Professor Morgan’s famous article, “Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept, “ 62 Harv.L.Rev. 177, 213 (1948). It appears to be the intent of the limitation of the hearsay definition under Fed.R.Evid, 801(a)(2) to non-verbal conduct “intended by the declarant as an assertion” to do away with the notion that implied assertions are within the hearsay prohibition. See McCormick on Evidence Section 250 at 743 (1984). See also 4 J. Weinstein and M. Berger, Weinstein’s Evidence 801 (a)[01] at p. 801-61 (1990). See Wilson v. Clancy, 747 F. Supp. 1154, 1158 (D. Md. 1990)(offer of affidavit in support of summary judgment in which silence of testator on critical fact was noted; held: silence is not within the 'realm' of hearsay, 'at least where there is no showing of intentional silence on particular occasion intended as assertion when silence was kept.') 

The drafters of the Federal Rules agreed with the criticisms of the common law rule that implied assertions should be treated as hearsay and expressly abolished it. See Weinstein, P ...

Register or login to access full content