Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

  A widely discussed example of the use of voir dire to eliminate jurors likely to nullify the law is the selection of 'death qualified' juries in capital cases. Jurors are excluded whose responses at voir dire indicate that their views on capital punishment 'would prevent or substantially impair the performance of [their] duties as . . . jurors in accordance with [their] instructions and [their] oath.' Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45, 65 L. Ed. 2d 581, 100 S. Ct. 2521 (1980); see also Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 513-14, 20 L. Ed. 2d 776, 88 S. Ct. 1770 (1968). 

Every day in courtrooms across the length and breadth of this country, jurors are dismissed from the venire 'for cause' precisely because they are unwilling or unable to follow the applicable law. Indeed, one of the principal purposes of voir dire is to ensure that the jurors ultimately selected for service are unbiased and willing and able to apply the law as instructed by the court to the evidence presented by the parties. The Federal Judicial Center's Benchbook for U.S. District Court Judges includes the following among its list of standard voir ...

Register or login to access full content