Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Rule 8(a)'s simplified pleading standard applies to all civil actions, with limited exceptions. Rule 9(b), for example, provides for greater particularity in all averments of fraud or mistake. 'In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other condition of mind of a person may be averred generally.' The Court has declined to extend such exceptions to other contexts. In Leatherman the court stated: '[T]he Federal Rules do address in Rule 9(b) the question of the need for greater particularity in pleading certain actions, but do not include among the enumerated actions any reference to complaints alleging municipal liability under 1983. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius.' 507 U.S., at 168. 

The requirements of Rule 9(b) must be read in conjunction with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which establishes the general rules of pleading. Subsections (a) and (e) of Rule 8 require a short and plain statement of the claim and that each averment be simple, concise, and direct. Then the sufficiency of a complaint under Rule 9(b) is challenged, 'is is the duty of the Court to balance' ...

Register or login to access full content