Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) summary judgment may be granted only where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The burden on the movant is stringent: 'all doubts as to the existence of material fact must be resolved against the movant.' Moore v. Marketplace Restaurant, Inc., 754 F.2d 1336, 1339 (7th Cir. 1985), quoting Dreher v. Sielaff, 636 F.2d 1141, 1143 n.4 (7th Cir. 1980).
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), a court will grant summary judgment if the evidence offered shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S. Ct. 2548, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265 (1986); see also Anderson v. Liberty, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202 (1986). Summary judgment for the moving party is appropriate 'where the nonmovant's evidence is merely colorable, conclusory, speculative, or not significantly probative.' Travelers Ins. Co. v. Broadway W. St. Assocs., 164 F.R.D. 154, ...