In considering a Rule 50(b)(3) motion for judgment as a matter of law, the district court must uphold the jury's award if there was any 'legally sufficient basis' to support it. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., 299 F.3d 838, 859 (9th Cir. 2002). In making that determination, the district court considers all of the evidence in the record, drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, Experience Hendrix; the court may not make any credibility determinations or reweigh the evidence. See Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 150, 120 S. Ct. 2097, 147 L. Ed. 2d 105 (2000). Because an appeals court reviews the district court's Rule 50(b)(3) decision de novo, they apply those same legal standards on appeal. See Go Daddy Software, 581 F.3d at 961.