Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 47(a) provides that a 'court may permit the parties or their attorneys to examine prospective jurors or may itself do so.' (emphasis added). The Rule thus places the decision as to whether to have the parties or the judge conduct voir dire firmly in the discretion of the district court. See, e.g., Csiszer v. Wren, 614 F.3d 866, 875 (8th Cir. 2010) ('Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 47(a) expressly permits a district court to conduct voir dire itself.'); Morrissey v. B.G. Danis Co., 779 F.2d 51, 1985 WL 13810, at *1 (6th Cir. 1985) ('Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 47(a), the district court has broad discretion to control and conduct the examination of prospective jurors during voir dire.'). Rule 47(a) further provides that, '[i]f the court examines the jurors, it must permit the parties or their attorneys to make any further inquiry it considers proper, or must itself ask any of their additional questions it considers proper.' (emphases added); see also Eisenhauer v. Burger, 431 F.2d 833, 836 (6th Cir. 1970) ('The scope of questions permitted to be asked on voir dire examination is generally a matter addressed ...

Register or login to access full content