Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 Rule 42(b) provides that separation is proper when a trial court determines that severance is 'in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be conducive to expedition or economy.' See FDIC v. Selaiden Builders, Inc., 973 F.2d 1249, 1253 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1051, 113 S. Ct. 1944, 123 L. Ed. 2d 650 (1993); Conkling v. Turner, 18 F.3d. 1285, 1293 (5th Cir. 1994). The decision to grant separate trials rests within the sole discretion of the trial court. Id., quoting First Tex. Sav. Ass'n v. Reliance Ins. Co., 950 F.2d 1171, 1174, n. 2 (5th Cir. 1992). 

The Fifth Circuit has recognized that 'there is an important limitation on ordering a separate trial of issues under Rule 42(b): the issue to be tried must be so distinct and separate from the others that a trial of it alone may be had without injustice.' McDaniel v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 987 F.2d 298, 305 and n.22 (5th Cir. 1993) (citations omitted). Moreover, 'even if bifurcation might somehow promote judicial economy, courts should not order separate trials when bifurcation would result in unnecessary delay, additional expense, or some ...

Register or login to access full content