Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The Federal Rules provide for sanctions against individual attorneys who are remiss in complying with their discovery obligations: [e]very discovery request, response or objection made by a party ... shall be signed by at least one attorney [and] [t]he signature of the attorney ... constitutes a certification that to the best of the signer's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after a reasonable inquiry, the request, response, or objection is: consistent with the rules and law, not interposed for an improper purpose, and not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (g)(2) (emphasis added). '[W]hat is reasonable is a matter for the court to decide on the totality of the circumstances.' Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Advisory Committee Notes (1983 Amendment). The Committee explained that: Rule 26(g) imposes an affirmative duty to engage in pretrial discovery in a responsible manner that is consistent with the spirit and purposes of Rules 26 through 37. In addition, Rule 26(g) is designed to curb discovery abuse by explicitly encouraging the imposition of sanctions. 

This subdivision provides a deterrent to both excessive discovery and evasion by imposing a certification requirement that obliges each attorney to stop and think ...

Register or login to access full content