Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 To determine whether a party is 'indispensable' under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19, a court must undertake a two-part analysis: it must first determine if an absent party is 'necessary' to the suit; then if, as here, the party cannot be joined, the court must determine whether the party is 'indispensible' so that in 'equity and good conscience' the suit should be dismissed. The inquiry is a practical one and fact specific, see Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102, 118-19, 19 L. Ed. 2d 936, 88 S. Ct. 733 (1968), and is designed to avoid the harsh results of rigid application. Eldredge v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Joint Apprenticeship & Training Comm., 662 F.2d 534, 537 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 917, 74 L. Ed. 2d 183, 103 S. Ct. 231 (1982). The moving party has the burden of persuasion in arguing for dismissal. Sierra Club v. Watt, 608 F. Supp. 305, 312 (E.D. Cal. 1985). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 provides: (a) Persons to be Joined if Feasible. A person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the ...

Register or login to access full content