Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly 548 U.S. 903 (2006), the task under Rule 12(b)(6) remain essentially the same with a slightly enhanced degree of scrutiny. First, a court 'continues to take all factual allegations as true and to draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.' Rodriguez-Ortiz, 490 F.3d at 96 (emphasis in original). Second, a court 'need not credit a complaint's bald assertions or legal conclusions.' Glassman v. Computervision Corp., 90 F.3d 617, 628 (1st Cir. 1996) (citation and internal quotation omitted). Third, a court must determine whether the complaint's factual allegations '`possess enough heft' to set forth `a plausible entitlement to relief.'' Gagliardi v. Sullivan, 513 F.3d 301, 305 (1st Cir.2008) (quoting Twombly, 127 S.Ct. at 1966-67). Finally, a court should dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim if it fails to set forth '`factual allegations, either direct or inferential, respecting each material element necessary to sustain recovery under some actionable legal theory.'' Id. (quoting Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc. v. Feliciano de Melecio, 406 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.2005)). 

Register or login to access full content