Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

This tort requires a specific area of confinement. An inconvenience or a detour is enough if it is extreme. No means of escape is available, meaning that one is not known or is unreasonable.

The gist of the common law tort is conduct by the actor which is intended to, and does in fact, 'confine' another 'within boundaries fixed by the actor' where, in addition, the victim is either 'conscious of the confinement or is harmed by it.' Restatement (Second), Torts § 35 (1965). See Knowlton v. Ross, 114 Me. 18, 95 A. 281 (Me. 1915); Whittaker v. Sanford, 110 Me. 77, 85 A. 399 (Me. 1912). While 'confinement' can be imposed by physical barriers or physical force, much less will do--although how much less becomes cloudy at the margins. It is generally settled that mere threats of physical force can suffice, Restatement, supra, § 40; and it is also settled that the threats may be implicit as well as explicit, see id. cmt. a; 32 Am. Jur. 2d False Imprisonment § 18 (1995) (collecting cases), and that confinement can also be based on a false assertion of legal authority to confine. Restatement, supra, § 41. Indeed, ...

Register or login to access full content