Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Contracts that seek to exculpate a party from liability for the party's own negligence are not favored by the law. Pride v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 244 S.C. 615, 138 S.E. (2d) 155 (1964). An exculpatory clause is to be strictly construed against the party relying thereon. Id. 'It will never be . . . construed . . . to exempt [a party] from liability for his own negligence . . . in the absence of explicit language clearly indicating that such was the intent of the parties.' Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 235 N.C. 705, 71 S.E. (2d) 133, 137 (1952). 

As far as public policy is concerned, parties are generally permitted to agree in advance that one is under no obligation of care for the benefit of the other, and shall not be liable for the consequences of conduct which would otherwise be negligent. Prosser, Law of Torts, § 68, at 442 (4th Ed. 1971).Thus, in the absence of legislation to the contrary, there is ordinarily no public policy which prevents parties from contracting as they see fit. Consequently, it is not against public policy to enter into an ...

Register or login to access full content