Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The exclusionary rule is not constitutionally required. Courts may limit its scope in order to restrict the rule 'to those areas where its remedial objectives are thought most efficaciously served.' United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 348, 38 L. Ed. 2d 561, 94 S. Ct. 613 (1974), quoted in Leon, 104 S. Ct. at 3413. See also Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 257-58, 76 L. Ed. 2d 527, 103 S. Ct. 2317 (1983) (White, J., concurring); Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 439-40, 49 L. Ed. 2d 1067, 96 S. Ct. 3037 (1976) (White, J., dissenting). The methodology used to determine the proper scope of the rule was suggested to the Leon majority by its prior cases. See Leon, 104 S. Ct. at 3413-16; Gates, 462 U.S. at 254-61 (White, J., concurring). A balancing test is employed to weigh the 'costs and benefits' of the rule as it operates in a particular category of cases. See Leon, 104 S. Ct. at 3412.

The Court in Leon found this balancing to reveal that 'the marginal or nonexistent benefits produced by suppressing evidence obtained in objectively reasonable reliance on a subsequently invalidated search warrant cannot ...

Register or login to access full content