Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The United States Constitution provides that neither Congress nor any state shall pass any ex post facto law. U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 3; art. I, § 10, cl. 1. See Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S. Ct. 2446, 2450, 96 L. Ed. 2d 351 (1987). The prohibition against ex post facto enactments bans 'every law that makes an action' done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action.' Id. at 2450 (quoting Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386, 390, 1 L. Ed. 648 (1798)). Although the ex post facto clause applies to the legislature and not to the courts, 'the principle on which the Clause is based -- the notion that persons have a right to fair warning of that conduct which will give rise to criminal penalties -- is fundamental to our concept of constitutional liberty.' Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188, 191, 51 L. Ed. 2d 260, 97 S. Ct. 990 (1977). Hence, the judicial enlargement of a criminal statute by retroactive application violates the fifth amendment due process clause in the same way a legislative ...

Register or login to access full content