Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The decedent spouse has testamentary power over his one-half of the community property. When the dissolution is by death, the item theory predominates. The item theory holds that the surviving spouse is the owner of an undivided half interest in every item of community property. The decedent cannot defeat the item theory by use of a will even if he disposes of no more than his half of the community estate by value. Some community items are incapable of transmission to third parties (goodwill in a legal practice). The courts could use the aggregate theory or apply the terminable interest rule to those assets incapable of transmission to third parties. An attempt by the decedent to dispose of community property puts the surviving spouse is put to an election. The will is treated as an offer to contract and will be accepted if the surviving spouse permits the will to dispose of property not owned by the decedent. Wills are generally interpreted to avoid an election where possible.

The law presumes that the decedent intends to devise or bequeath only what he owns. If there are ambiguities in the will they will be resolved against a construction that ...

Register or login to access full content