Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

See also Misappropriation. The notion of a common law misappropriation cause of action originated with the Supreme Court's pre-Erie24 decision in International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215, 236-40, 39 S. Ct. 68, 63 L. Ed. 211 (1918), in which the Supreme Court concluded that defendant had misappropriated plaintiff's East Coast 'hot news' stories by publishing the stories on the West Coast. McCarthy § 10:48. The International News Service decision, however, purported to 'establish a principal of federal common law,' and Erie eliminated federal common law in diversity cases. Barclays Capital Inc. v., Inc., 650 F.3d 876, 894 (2d Cir. 2011). As such, International News Service is 'no longer good law.' Id. For the same reason, the Virginia Supreme Court's decision in Benjamin T. Crump Co., Inc. v. J. L. Lindsay, Inc., 130 Va. 144, 107 S.E. 679, 679-80 (Va. 1921), which addressed the impact of International News Service on unfair competition doctrine, is not authoritative. The Crump decision is noteworthy, however, because the Supreme Court of Virginia declined to expand the Virginia law of unfair competition beyond its traditional limits to encompass common law misappropriation claims. Id. at 679-80, 684. ...

Register or login to access full content