Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The Supreme Court has never doubted that there are limits upon the power of Congress to override state sovereignty, even when exercising its otherwise plenary powers to tax or to regulate commerce which are conferred by Art. I of the Constitution. In Wirtz, for example, the Court took care to assure the appellants that it had 'ample power to prevent . . . the utter destruction of the State as a sovereign political entity,'' which they feared. 392 U.S. at 392 U. S. 196. Our federal system of government imposes definite limits upon the authority of Congress to regulate the activities of the States as States by means of the commerce power. In Fry, the Court recognized that an express declaration of this limitation is found in the Tenth Amendment: 'While the Tenth Amendment has been characterized as a 'truism,' stating merely that 'all is retained which has not been surrendered,' 312 U. S. 124 (1941), it is not without significance. The Amendment expressly declares the constitutional policy that Congress may not exercise power in a fashion that impairs the States' integrity or their ability to function effectively in a federal system.' 421 U.S. ...

Register or login to access full content