Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Interstate commerce may be made to ''pay its way.'' Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274, 281, 51 L. Ed. 2d 326, 97 S. Ct. 1076 (1977). 'It was not the purpose of the commerce clause to relieve those engaged in interstate commerce from their just share of state tax burden[s].' Western Live Stock v. Bureau of Revenue, 303 U.S. 250, 254, 58 S. Ct. 546, 82 L. Ed. 823 (1938). See also Henneford v. Silas Mason Co., 300 U.S. 577, 81 L. Ed. 814, 57 S. Ct. 524 (1937). Nevertheless, one of the central purposes of the Clause was to prevent States from 'exacting more than a just share' from interstate commerce. Department of Revenue of Wash. v. Association of Wash. Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734, 748, 55 L. Ed. 2d 682, 98 S. Ct. 1388 (1978) (emphasis added). See also Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450, 462, 3 L. Ed. 2d 421, 79 S. Ct. 357 (1959).

At least since the decision in Hinson v. Lott, 75 U.S. 148, 8 Wall. 148, 19 L. Ed. 387 (1869), these principles have found expression in the 'compensatory' ...

Register or login to access full content