Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 In applying the collateral order doctrine, courts have stressed that it must 'never be allowed to swallow the general rule that a party is entitled to a single appeal, to be deferred until final judgment has been entered.' Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.,511 U.S. 863, 868, 114 S.Ct. 1992, 128 L.Ed.2d 842 (1994) (citation omitted); see also Will v. Hallock,546 U.S. 345, 350, 126 S.Ct. 952, 163 L.Ed.2d 836 (2006) ('emphasizing [the doctrine's] modest scope'). This admonition reflects a healthy respect for the virtues of the final-judgment rule. Permitting piecemeal, prejudgment appeals, we have recognized, undermines 'efficient judicial administration' and encroaches upon the prerogatives of district court judges, who play a 'special role' in managing ongoing litigation. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord,449 U.S. 368, 374, 101 S.Ct. 669, 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981); see also Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller,472 U.S. 424, 436, 105 S.Ct. 2757, 86 L.Ed.2d 340 (1985) ('[T]he district judge can better exercise [his or her] responsibility [to police the prejudgment tactics of litigants] if the appellate courts do not repeatedly intervene to second-guess prejudgment rulings').

The justification for immediate appeal must therefore be sufficiently strong to overcome the usual ...

Register or login to access full content