Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

In Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32, 85 L. Ed. 22, 61 S. Ct. 115 (1940), the Supreme Court entertained a collateral attack on an Illinois state court class action judgment that purported to bind the plaintiffs. The Court held that class action judgments can only bind absent class members where 'the interests of those not joined are of the same class as the interests of those who are, and where it is considered that the latter fairly represent the former in the prosecution of the litigation.' Id. 311 U.S. at 41; cf. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797, 805, 86 L. Ed. 2d 628, 105 S. Ct. 2965 (1985) ('It is true that a court adjudicating a dispute may not be able to predetermine the res judicata effect of its own judgment.'). A 'judgment in a class action is not secure from collateral attack unless the absentees were adequately and vigorously represented.' Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 590 F.2d 433, 440 n. 15 (2d Cir. 1978); aff'd 444 U.S. 472, 62 L. Ed. 2d 676, 100 S. Ct. 745 (1980).

To answer the question whether the class representative ...

Register or login to access full content