Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The presence of one at the commission of a felony by another is evidence to be considered in determining whether or not he was guilty of aiding or abetting, and it has been held that presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the offense are circumstances from which one's participation in the criminal intent may be inferred. See, People v. Moore, 120 Cal. App. (2d) 303, 306, 260 P. (2d) 1011, 1013. If a defendant was present during the criminal activity and did nothing to prevent the offenses committed under some circumstances this presence may have helped to make the crimes possible. Therefore, a lack of objection under the circumstances may support a conviction. See, People v. Villa, 156 Cal. App. (2d) 128, 136, 318 P. (2d) 828, 834. 

It has been established that a person may aid or abet without actively participating in the over act. If the proof shows that a person is present at the commission of a crime without disapproving or opposing it, it is competent for the jury to consider this conduct in connection with other circumstances and thereby reach the conclusion that he assented to the commission of the ...

Register or login to access full content