Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

As issue is the admission of photographs which could possibly inflame the minds and passions of the jurors. The photograph must be 'of such evidentiary value that [its] need clearly outweighs the likelihood of inflaming the minds and passions of the jurors.' Commonwealth v. Petrakovich, [459 Pa. 511, 329 A.2d 844 (1974)]. It should serve as an aid to the jury in understanding the crime committed. Further, the photograph might serve a number of specific and well-recognized evidentiary purposes. The photograph might prove the corpus delicti. 

In Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 499 Pa. 597, 454, 454 A.2d 547 (1982), the Court stated: 'A criminal homicide trial is, by its very nature, unpleasant, and the photographic images of the injuries inflicted are merely consonant with the brutality of the subject of the inquiry. To permit the disturbing nature of the images of the victim to rule the question of admissibility would result in exclusion of all photographs of the homicide victim, and would defeat one of the essential functions of a criminal trial, inquiry into the intent of the actor.

There is no need to so overextend an attempt to sanitize the evidence as to deprive ...

Register or login to access full content