Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Article III of the Constitution limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to 'actual cases or controversies between proper litigants.' Fla. Audubon Soc'y v. Bentsen, 94 F.3d 658, 661, 320 U.S. App. D.C. 324 (D.C. Cir. 1996). To establish constitutional standing, plaintiffs 'must have suffered or be imminently threatened with a concrete and particularized injury in fact that is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.' Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1377, 1386, 188 L. Ed. 2d 392 (2014); see also Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S. Ct. 2130, 119 L. Ed. 2d 351 (1992).

The requirements for standing differ where, plaintiffs seek to enforce procedural (rather than substantive) rights. When plaintiffs challenge an action taken without required procedural safeguards, they must establish the agency action threatens their concrete interest. Fla. Audubon Soc'y, 94 F.3d at 664. It is not enough to assert 'a mere general interest in the alleged procedural violation common to all members of the public.' Id. Once that threshold is satisfied, the normal standards for immediacy and ...

Register or login to access full content