Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The Supreme Court uses a two-tiered test to determine if there is a First Amendment right to access to an administrative hearing. The test, the court stated, quoting Press-Enterprise Co. v Superior Ct. (478 U.S. 1), 'includes 'whether the place and process have historically been open to the press and general public' and 'whether public access plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the particular process in question.' 

The two most recent Supreme Court opinions dealing with the First Amendment right of access are Press-Enterprise Co. v Superior Ct. of Cal. (Press-Enterprise I) (464 U.S. 501 [upholding First Amendment right of access for voir dire proceeding in a criminal trial]) and Press-Enterprise Co. v Superior Ct. (Press-Enterprise II) (478 U.S. 1, supra [First Amendment right of access for preliminary hearing in criminal case]). There is no basis in either opinion for concluding that the Supreme Court no longer relies on the historical tradition of access as a significant consideration in determining whether a particular proceeding should receive First Amendment protection.

In Press-Enterprise I, Chief Justice Burger, writing for eight members of the Court, resummarized the thorough exigesis given in his plurality ...

Register or login to access full content