Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

A court does not defer to an agency's construction of a statute interpreted by more than one agency, e.g., Association of Am. Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. Clinton, 302 U.S. App. D.C. 208, 997 F.2d 898, 913 (D.C. Cir. 1993). 

See Clinton, 997 F.2d at 913, which involved the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the court cited two cases involving statutes that apply to all agencies. See FLRA v. United States Dep't of Treasury, 280 U.S. App. D.C. 236, 884 F.2d 1446, 1451 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (no deference to FLRA's interpretation of the Freedom of Information Act ('FOIA') and the Privacy Act because 'the FLRA is not charged with a special duty to interpret' these statutes), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1055 (1990); Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press v. United States Dep't of Justice, 259 U.S. App. D.C. 426, 816 F.2d 730, 734 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (no deference to any agency interpretation of FOIA because 'it applies to all government agencies, and thus no one executive branch entity is entrusted with its primary interpretation'), rev'd on other grounds, 489 U.S. 749, 103 L. Ed. 2d 774, 109 S. Ct. 1468 (1989). 


Register or login to access full content