Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 An agency’s prosecutorial discretion is subject to review under a patent abuse of discretion standard. This standard makes it almost impossible for the regulated party to prevail on a discriminatory enforcement claim.  

In Moog Industries v. Federal Trade Commission 355 U. S. 411 (1958), the court set forth the principles which must govern a review of the action taken by the court below: the decision as to whether to postpone enforcement of a cease and desist order 'depends on a variety of factors peculiarly within the expert understanding of the Commission.' 355 U.S. at 355 U. S. 413. Thus, 'although an allegedly illegal practice may appear to be operative throughout an industry, whether such appearances reflect fact' is a question 'that call[s] for discretionary determination by the administrative agency.' Ibid. Because these determinations require the specialized experienced judgment of the Commission, they cannot be overturned by the courts 'in the absence of a patent abuse of discretion.' 355 U.S. at 355 U. S. 414. Consequently, the reviewing court's inquiry is not whether the evidence adduced in support of a petition for a stay tends to establish certain facts, such as that ...

Register or login to access full content