Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 Section 557(d) contains two possible administrative remedies for improper ex parte communications. The first is disclosure of the communication and its content. 5 U.S.C. § 557(d) (1) (C) (1976). The second requires the violating party to 'show cause why his claim or interest in the proceeding should not be dismissed, denied, disregarded, or otherwise adversely affected on account of [the] violation.' Id. § 557(d) (1) (D); See also id. § 556(d). Congress did not intend, however, that an agency would require a party to 'show cause' after every violation or that an agency would dismiss a party's interest more than rarely. See S. REP. NO. 354, supra, at 37-39, SUNSHINE ACT SOURCEBOOK at 232-34. Indeed, the statutory language clearly states that a party's interest in the proceeding may be adversely affected only 'to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy of the underlying statutes.' 5 U.S.C. § 557(d) (1) (D) (1976). 

The Government in the Sunshine Act contains no specific provisions for judicial remedy of improper ex parte communications. However, a court may infer from approving citations in the House and Senate Reports that Congress did not intend to alter the existing ...

Register or login to access full content