Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The Supreme Court has rejected the argument that an agency's interpretation 'is not entitled to deference because it represents a sharp break with prior interpretations' of the statute in question. Chevron, 467 U.S. at 467 U. S. 862. In Chevron, the court held that a revised interpretation deserves deference because '[a]n initial agency interpretation is not instantly carved in stone,' and 'the agency, to engage in informed rulemaking, must consider varying interpretations and the wisdom of its policy on a continuing basis.' Id. at 467 U. S. 863-864. An agency is not required to 'establish rules of conduct to last forever,'' 463 U. S. 42 (1983), quoting American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Atchinson, T. & S.F.R. Co., 387 U. S. 397, 387 U. S. 416 (1967); NLRB v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., 494 U. S. 775 (1990), but rather 'must be given ample latitude to `adapt [its] rules and policies to the demands of changing circumstances.'' Motor Vehicle Mfrs., supra, 463 U.S. at 463 U. S. 42, quoting Permian Basin Area Rate Cases, 390 U. S. 747, 390 U. S. 784 (1968). 

An agency's interpretation of a statute is not entitled to ...

Register or login to access full content