Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

Blackstone asserts in his discussion of what offenses admit of accessories: 'In murder and other felonies, there may be accessories: except only in those offences, which by judgment of the law are sudden and unpremeditated, as manslaughter and the like; which therefore cannot have any accessories before the fact.' Blackstone *36. Commentators. Perkins characterizes it as 'a far-fetched corollary' to the rule that an accessory cannot be tried before his principal. Perkins Criminal Law 643 (2d ed. 1969). 1 F. Wharton, Criminal Law § 680, p. 908 (12th ed. 1932) states flatly: 'A person may be legally convicted as accessory before the fact of murder in the second degree.' 1 R. Anderson, Wharton's Criminal Law and Procedure § 111, p. 241 (1957) asserts: 'There may be accessories before the fact to the crime of murder in different degrees.' This view is thus explained in Wharton: 'It has been doubted whether there can be an accessory before the fact to manslaughter, since accessoryship presupposes premeditation, and premeditation is incompatible with manslaughter. But . . . an instigator may, in hot blood, stimulate a person incensed with another to execute a deed of vengeance on such other, when the offense of ...

Register or login to access full content