Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

It is true, as remarked by the court, in Thompson v. Gould, 37 Mass. 134, 20 Pick. 134, 139, that--'When there is an agreement for the sale and purchase of goods and chattels, and, after the agreement, and before the sale is completed, the property is destroyed by casualty, the loss must be borne by the vender, the property remaining vested in him at the time of its destruction;' Tarling v. Baxter, 9 Dow. & Ryl. 276; Hinde v. Whitehouse, 7 East 558; Rugg v. Minett, 11 East 210. 

If the agreement is completed by the concurrent assent of both parties; Adams v. Lindsell, 1 Barn. & Ald. 681; Mactier v. Frith, 6 Wend. 103, the property is vested in the vendee. 

In Dixon v. Yates, 5 Barn. & Adol. 313, PARKE, J., remarks (E. C. L. R. vol. 27, p. 92,): 'Where there is a sale of goods, generally no property in them passes till delivery, because until then the very goods sold are not ascertained; but when, by the contract itself the vender appropriates to the vendee a specific chattel, and the latter thereby agrees to take that specific ...

Register or login to access full content