Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

 Generally, 'in order for an acceptance to be effective, it must comply with the terms of the offer and be clear, unambiguous and unequivocal.' King v. King, 208 A.D.2d 1143, 617 N.Y.S.2d 593, 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994); see also 2 Williston on Contracts § 6:10 (4th ed. 2007) ('As a general principle, at common law an acceptance, in order to be effective, must be positive and unambiguous.'). When an offeree communicates 'an acceptance [that] is ambiguous or equivocal-that is, an acceptance that a reasonable person could view as assent, rejection, or an invitation to bargain further . . . it is the offeror's reaction to that ambiguous acceptance that controls whether the parties have entered into a contract.' Johnson, 629 F. Supp. 2d at 330.

By their nature, equivocal responses are capable of being understood either as the offeree apparently intends them . . . or as the offeror might apparently understand them. . . . To the extent that either interpretation is plausible, the offeree can hardly complain if the offeror understands the communication as the offeree apparently intended; and the offeror who reasonably treats an equivocal response as an acceptance may ...

Register or login to access full content