Helpful Hints
  • (1) You can search the entire content of Dean’s by phrase or by individual words. Just type your keywords into the search box and then pull down the search icon on the right and choose the option you need: search by word or by phrase or reset the content.
  • (2) Double click on a word in the content of a definition, and if the word is listed as a keyword in Dean’s, it will look that word up.
  • (3) You can use the search function to help jump the scrolling function. Simply type the first 2-3 letters into the search box then hit enter on your keyboard and the scroll will go to those Keywords that begin with those letters and allow you to scroll from there.

The misapplication of the law by a judge through whim or caprice. An arbitrary decision which amounts to a denial of justice. One that is clearly against logic and effect of the facts presented. A standard of review for an appellate court related to lower court decisions. A decision of a judge that is grossly unsound, unreasonable, illegal, or unsupported by the evidence. 


Other crimes evidence is admissible to prove modus operandi, intent, identity, motive, absence of mistake, or if it is relevant to establish any material question other than the propensity to commit a crime. (People v. Thingvold (1991), 145 Ill. 2d 441, 452, 584 N.E.2d 89, 164 Ill. Dec. 877; People v. Contreras, 246 Ill. App. 3d 502, 615 N.E.2d 1261, 186 Ill. Dec. 204 (2d Dist., 1993).) When such evidence is offered, the trial court must weigh the relevance of the evidence against the prejudicial effect it may have upon the defendant. (Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d at 452; Contreras, slip op. at 16-17.) The trial court's ruling as to the admissibility of such evidence will not be reversed absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion. Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d at ...

Register or login to access full content



Professors
Professionals
Students